2007-09-23 08:04:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
How to report a bug in Debian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Important things to note before sending
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-23 08:04:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Please don't report multiple unrelated bugs -- especially ones in
|
|
|
|
|
different packages -- in a single bug report. It makes our lives much
|
2007-09-23 08:04:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
easier if you send separate reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should check if your bug report has already been filed by someone
|
|
|
|
|
else before submitting it. Lists of currently outstanding bugs are
|
2007-09-23 08:04:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
available on the World Wide Web and elsewhere -- see other documents
|
2007-09-23 08:04:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
for details. You can submit your comments to an existing bug report
|
|
|
|
|
#<number> by sending e-mail to <number>@bugs.debian.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you can't seem to determine which package contains the problem,
|
|
|
|
|
please send e-mail to the Debian user mailing list asking for advice.
|
|
|
|
|
If your problem doesn't relate just to one package but some general
|
|
|
|
|
Debian service, there are several pseudo-packages or even mailing
|
|
|
|
|
lists that you can use to relay your message to us instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you'd like to send a copy of your bug report to additional
|
|
|
|
|
recipients (such as mailing lists), you shouldn't use the usual e-mail
|
|
|
|
|
headers, but a different method, described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sending the bug report using an automatic bug report tool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reportbug program can ease filing bugs by guiding you through the
|
|
|
|
|
bug reporting process step by step. The querybts tool, available from
|
|
|
|
|
the same package as reportbug, provides a convenient text-based
|
|
|
|
|
interface to the bug tracking system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs users can also use the debian-bug command provided by the
|
|
|
|
|
debian-el package. When called with M-x debian-bug, it will ask for
|
|
|
|
|
all necessary information in a similar way to reportbug.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sending the bug report via e-mail
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-23 08:04:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Send e-mail to submit@bugs.debian.org, as described below.
|
2007-09-23 08:04:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-23 08:04:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Of course, like any e-mail, you should include a clear, descriptive
|
2007-09-23 08:04:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Subject line in your main mail header. The subject you give will be
|
|
|
|
|
used as the initial bug title in the tracking system, so please try to
|
|
|
|
|
make it informative!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You need to put a pseudo-header at the start of the body of the
|
|
|
|
|
message. That means that the first line of the message body should
|
|
|
|
|
say:
|
|
|
|
|
Package: <something>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replace <something> with the name of the package which has the bug.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second line of the message should say:
|
|
|
|
|
Version: <something>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replace <something> with the version of the package. Please don't
|
|
|
|
|
include any text here other than the version itself, as the bug
|
|
|
|
|
tracking system relies on this field to work out which releases are
|
|
|
|
|
affected by the bug.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You need to supply a correct Package line in the pseudo-header in
|
|
|
|
|
order for the bug tracking system to deliver the message to the
|
|
|
|
|
package's maintainer. See this example for information on how to find
|
|
|
|
|
this information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pseudo-header fields should start at the very start of their
|
|
|
|
|
lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please include in your report:
|
|
|
|
|
* The exact and complete text of any error messages printed or
|
|
|
|
|
logged. This is very important!
|
|
|
|
|
* Exactly what you typed or did to demonstrate the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
* A description of the incorrect behaviour: exactly what behaviour
|
|
|
|
|
you were expecting, and what you observed. A transcript of an
|
|
|
|
|
example session is a good way of showing this.
|
|
|
|
|
* A suggested fix, or even a patch, if you have one.
|
|
|
|
|
* Details of the configuration of the program with the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Include the complete text of its configuration files.
|
|
|
|
|
* The versions of any packages on which the buggy package depends.
|
|
|
|
|
* What kernel version you're using (type uname -a), your shared C
|
|
|
|
|
library (type ls -l /lib/libc.so.6 or dpkg -s libc6 | grep
|
|
|
|
|
^Version), and any other details about your Debian system, if it
|
|
|
|
|
seems appropriate. For example, if you had a problem with a Perl
|
|
|
|
|
script, you would want to provide the version of the `perl' binary
|
|
|
|
|
(type perl -v or dpkg -s perl | grep ^Version:).
|
|
|
|
|
* Appropriate details of the hardware in your system. If you're
|
|
|
|
|
reporting a problem with a device driver please list all the
|
|
|
|
|
hardware in your system, as problems are often caused by IRQ and
|
|
|
|
|
I/O address conflicts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-23 08:04:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Include any detail that seems relevant -- you are in very little
|
|
|
|
|
danger of making your report too long by including too much
|
|
|
|
|
information. If they are small please include in your report any files
|
|
|
|
|
you were using to reproduce the problem (uuencoding them if they may
|
|
|
|
|
contain odd characters etc.).
|
2007-09-23 08:04:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more advice on how to help the developers solve your problem,
|
|
|
|
|
please read How to Report Bugs Effectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A bug report, with mail header, looks something like this:
|
|
|
|
|
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
|
|
|
|
|
From: diligent@testing.linux.org
|
|
|
|
|
Subject: Hello says `goodbye'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Package: hello
|
|
|
|
|
Version: 1.3-16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When I invoke `hello' without arguments from an ordinary shell
|
|
|
|
|
prompt it prints `goodbye', rather than the expected `hello, world'.
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a transcript:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ hello
|
|
|
|
|
goodbye
|
|
|
|
|
$ /usr/bin/hello
|
|
|
|
|
goodbye
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest that the output string, in hello.c, be corrected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am using Debian GNU/Linux 2.2, kernel 2.2.17-pre-patch-13
|
|
|
|
|
and libc6 2.1.3-10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sending copies of bug reports to other addresses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes it is necessary to send a copy of a bug report to somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
else besides debian-bugs-dist and the package maintainer, which is
|
|
|
|
|
where they are normally sent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You could do this by CC'ing your bug report to the other address(es),
|
|
|
|
|
but then the other copies would not have the bug report number put in
|
|
|
|
|
the Reply-To field and the Subject line. When the recipients reply
|
|
|
|
|
they will probably preserve the submit@bugs.debian.org entry in the
|
|
|
|
|
header and have their message filed as a new bug report. This leads to
|
|
|
|
|
many duplicated reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The right way to do this is to use the X-Debbugs-CC header. Add a line
|
|
|
|
|
like this to your message's mail header:
|
|
|
|
|
X-Debbugs-CC: other-list@cosmic.edu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This will cause the bug tracking system to send a copy of your report
|
|
|
|
|
to the address(es) in the X-Debbugs-CC line as well as to
|
|
|
|
|
debian-bugs-dist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid sending such copies to the addresses of other bug reports, as
|
|
|
|
|
they will be caught by the checks that prevent mail loops. There is
|
|
|
|
|
relatively little point in using X-Debbugs-CC for this anyway, as the
|
|
|
|
|
bug number added by that mechanism will just be replaced by a new one;
|
|
|
|
|
use an ordinary CC header instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-23 08:04:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This feature can often be combined usefully with mailing quiet -- see
|
2007-09-23 08:04:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severity levels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a report is of a particularly serious bug, or is merely a feature
|
|
|
|
|
request that, you can set the severity level of the bug as you report
|
|
|
|
|
it. This is not required, however, and the developers will assign an
|
|
|
|
|
appropriate severity level to your report if you do not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To assign a severity level, put a line like this one in the
|
|
|
|
|
pseudo-header:
|
|
|
|
|
Severity: <severity>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replace <severity> with one of the available severity levels, as
|
|
|
|
|
described in the developers' documentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assigning tags
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can set tags on a bug as you are reporting it. For example, if you
|
|
|
|
|
are including a patch with your bug report, you may wish to set the
|
|
|
|
|
patch tag. This is not required, however, and the developers will set
|
|
|
|
|
tags on your report as and when it is appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To set tags, put a line like this one in the pseudo-header:
|
|
|
|
|
Tags: <tags>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replace <tags> with one or more of the available tags, as described in
|
|
|
|
|
the developers' documentation. Separate multiple tags with commas,
|
|
|
|
|
spaces, or both.
|
2007-09-23 08:04:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
User: <username>
|
|
|
|
|
Usertags: <usertags>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replace <usertags> with one or more usertags. Separate multiple tags
|
|
|
|
|
with commas, spaces, or both. If you specify a <username>, that user's
|
|
|
|
|
tags will be set. Otherwise, the e-mail address of the sender will be
|
|
|
|
|
used as the username.
|
2007-09-23 08:04:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other pseudo headers (primarily of interest to package maintainers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forwarded: foo@example.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
will mark the newly submitted bug as forwarded to foo@example.com. See
|
|
|
|
|
Recording that you have passed on a bug report in the developers'
|
|
|
|
|
documentation for details.
|
|
|
|
|
Owner: foo@example.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
will indicate that foo@example.com is now responsible for fixing this
|
|
|
|
|
bug. See Changing bug ownership in the developers' documentation for
|
|
|
|
|
details.
|
|
|
|
|
Source: foopackage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the equivalent of Package: for bugs present in the source package of
|
|
|
|
|
foopackage; for most bugs in most packages you don't want to use this
|
|
|
|
|
option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, if your MUA doesn't allow you to edit the headers, you can
|
|
|
|
|
set the various X-Debbugs- headers in the pseudo-headers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Different submission addresses (minor or mass bug reports)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a bug report is minor, for example, a documentation typo or a
|
|
|
|
|
trivial build problem, please adjust the severity appropriately and
|
|
|
|
|
send it to maintonly@bugs instead of submit@bugs. maintonly will
|
|
|
|
|
forward the report to the package maintainer only, it won't forward it
|
|
|
|
|
to the BTS mailing lists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you're submitting many reports at once, you should definitely use
|
|
|
|
|
maintonly@bugs so that you don't cause too much redundant traffic on
|
|
|
|
|
the BTS mailing lists. Before submitting many similar bugs you may
|
|
|
|
|
also want to post a summary on debian-bugs-dist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If wish to report a bug to the bug tracking system that's already been
|
|
|
|
|
sent to the maintainer, you can use quiet@bugs. Bugs sent to
|
|
|
|
|
quiet@bugs will not be forwarded anywhere, only filed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you use different submission addresses, the bug tracking system
|
|
|
|
|
will set the Reply-To of any forwarded message so that the replies
|
|
|
|
|
will by default be processed in the same way as the original report.
|
|
|
|
|
That means that, for example, replies to maintonly will go to
|
|
|
|
|
nnn-maintonly@bugs instead of nnn@bugs, unless of course one overrides
|
|
|
|
|
this manually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acknowledgements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normally, the bug tracking system will return an acknowledgement to
|
|
|
|
|
you by e-mail when you report a new bug or submit additional
|
|
|
|
|
information to an existing bug. If you want to suppress this
|
|
|
|
|
acknowledgement, include an X-Debbugs-No-Ack header in your e-mail
|
|
|
|
|
(the contents of this header do not matter; however, it must be in the
|
|
|
|
|
mail header and not in the pseudo-header with the Package field). If
|
|
|
|
|
you report a new bug with this header, you will need to check the web
|
|
|
|
|
interface yourself to find the bug number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that this header will not suppress acknowledgements from the
|
|
|
|
|
control@bugs mailserver, since those acknowledgements may contain
|
|
|
|
|
error messages which should be read and acted upon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bug reports against unknown packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the bug tracking system doesn't know who the maintainer of the
|
|
|
|
|
relevant package is it'll forward the report to debian-bugs-dist even
|
|
|
|
|
if maintonly was used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When sending to maintonly@bugs or nnn-maintonly@bugs you should make
|
|
|
|
|
sure that the bug report is assigned to the right package, by putting
|
|
|
|
|
a correct Package at the top of an original submission of a report, or
|
|
|
|
|
by using the control@bugs service to (re)assign the report
|
|
|
|
|
appropriately first if it isn't correct already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using dpkg to find the package and version for the report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are reporting a bug in a command, you can find out which
|
|
|
|
|
package installed it by using dpkg --search. You can find out which
|
|
|
|
|
version of a package you have installed by using dpkg --list or dpkg
|
|
|
|
|
--status.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
|
$ which apt-get
|
|
|
|
|
/usr/bin/apt-get
|
|
|
|
|
$ type apt-get
|
|
|
|
|
apt-get is /usr/bin/apt-get
|
|
|
|
|
$ dpkg --search /usr/bin/apt-get
|
|
|
|
|
apt: /usr/bin/apt-get
|
|
|
|
|
$ dpkg --list apt
|
|
|
|
|
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
|
|
|
|
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|
|
|
|
|
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
|
|
|
|
|
||/ Name Version Description
|
|
|
|
|
+++-==============-==============-============================================
|
|
|
|
|
ii apt 0.3.19 Advanced front-end for dpkg
|
|
|
|
|
$ dpkg --status apt
|
|
|
|
|
Package: apt
|
|
|
|
|
Status: install ok installed
|
|
|
|
|
Priority: standard
|
|
|
|
|
Section: base
|
|
|
|
|
Installed-Size: 1391
|
|
|
|
|
Maintainer: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
|
|
|
|
|
Version: 0.3.19
|
|
|
|
|
Replaces: deity, libapt-pkg-doc (<< 0.3.7), libapt-pkg-dev (<< 0.3.7)
|
|
|
|
|
Provides: libapt-pkg2.7
|
|
|
|
|
Depends: libapt-pkg2.7, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libstdc++2.10
|
|
|
|
|
Suggests: dpkg-dev
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts: deity
|
|
|
|
|
Description: Advanced front-end for dpkg
|
|
|
|
|
This is Debian's next generation front-end for the dpkg package manager.
|
|
|
|
|
It provides the apt-get utility and APT dselect method that provides a
|
|
|
|
|
simpler, safer way to install and upgrade packages.
|
|
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
APT features complete installation ordering, multiple source capability
|
|
|
|
|
and several other unique features, see the Users Guide in
|
|
|
|
|
/usr/doc/apt/guide.text.gz
|
|
|
|
|
_________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debian BTS administrators <owner@bugs.debian.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debian bug tracking system
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright <20> 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997, 2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
|
|
|
|
|
1994-1997 Ian Jackson.
|
|
|
|
|
_________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|