addressing an old fixme, should distro and parent-distro be identical (in
a derivative build) we want to avoid wasting effort downloading and
processing the same content files twice.
since parent and non-parent have separate archive-area lists though we
should perhaps not just assume that they are identical or ignore any
differences; thus here in such a situation we ensure that we handle any
archive areas not already done for parent-distro handling in such a case,
while skipping those already done.
i notice that the fixme actually also refers to avoiding actual
overlapping of the cached files, however the cached files are (currently)
always ignored anyway, so this is of no concern. reusing the cached files
is an entirely separate issue.
Gbp-Dch: Short
Closes: #952909
the 'manually add firmware-linux package' bit was stuck inbetween the
parent and non-parent logic, which was especially unhelpful before we
de-duplicated the logic into a common function.
Gbp-Dch: Short
Edit: There were four copies of the same logic to keep in sync;
Originally this patch deduplicated each file, but leaving a copy of
the new function in each, thus reducing the duplication but not
eliminating it. A later patch moved it into a shared function file
following further enhancements to the code in question. This has
since been revised to have the function moved to a shared file here,
which simplifies and gives a cleaner diff.
Gbp-Dch: Short
Closes: #952908
the archive content file downloaded to obtain a list of firmware packages
is always deleted and downloaded afresh currently. it may not be ideal that
we do not make use of the cache here, however while that remains
unaddressed, we might as well delete the file after we've used it in order
to not pointlessly waste disk space.
note that this file is ~613 MB for sid-amd64 currently.
Gbp-Dch: Short
Closes: #952907
where multiple archive areas are used, the code here on each loop is:
1) fetching the archive area contents file (compressed)
2) **appending** the output to that of the previous loop
3) searching the file for firmware references, adding to the list
since it appends rather than replaces, entries found in each loop get
re-added on each subsequent loop, resulting in duplication in the
resulting list
below I evaluate the possible solutions to explain why I chose the one
I chose, however the reader should not waste too much time worrying about
whether one of the other solution would have actually been better because
things are changed significantly in further commits shortly!
possible solutions:
a) switching to output (>) rather than append (>>), but this might fail
against an existing file
b) removing the file on each loop, but this will complicate any future
caching improvements that might be made here (currently the files are
always deleted and thus downloaded fresh)
c) allow the appending, evaluating the complete file after the loop
solution C warrants consideration of disk space consumption; currently the
compressed 'main' archive (for sid on amd64) expands to 592.3 MB (feb-2020),
'contrib' is 3.1 MB, and 'non-free' is 18.5 MB.
solution C was chosen here; the difference of accumulated file size vs.
max-single was minor enough to not be of particular concern (~613 vs.
~592 MB).
Gbp-Dch: Short
Closes: #952906
These functions are specific to handling packages stored in the
cache, not other files. They are also always used with the same
`cache/packages.` prefix to the path.
Gbp-Dch: Short
Closes: #952916
instead of trying all from derived mirror then falling back to parent upon
failure, which as pointed out by a message printed out can result in a
load of spurious 404 errors; actually get each udeb from the mirror it is
supposed to be retrieved from.
Partial fix for #952914, this is the last commit for it so closes it
Gbp-Dch: Short
Closes: #952914
the existing logic just bundled the entire parent and derived udeb lists
together, ignoring the fact that there might thus be two instances of some
packages, and relying upon getting derived ones first and checking file
existence to avoid handling the overridden parent instances.
here we now actually filter the list of parent udebs to exclude packages
that are to be obtained from the derivative.
this enables avoiding the file existence checking
Partial fix for #952914
Gbp-Dch: Short
move the code that checks whether a version of a given package has already
been obtained (to account for parent and derived both listing the same
package) to guard the copy from cache action also, not just the download
action.
in rare but possible scenarios it would have been possible to end up with
both the parent and derived copies of a package included.
Partial fix for #952914
Gbp-Dch: Short
`false` and `none` make no sense as choices for this option. Here we
replace `false` with `none`, and remove `true`.
Note that `true` was treated as an alias for netinst (see the changes to
source_disk and and binary_disk).
For backwards compatibility we still allow `true` and `false` by converting
them to `netinst` and `none` respectively, whilst printing a warning to
encourage users to move to `netinst`/`none`.
Gbp-Dch: Short
Closes: #952864
including:
- spaces replaced with tabs for consistency
- alignment of `;;` in some case statements changed for consistency
Gbp-Dch: Short
Closes: #952857
apt-ftparchive is not able to differentiate between .deb and .udeb so
we have to install them in different pool directories so that we can
regenerate the Packages files without having the .udeb show up
unexpectedly.
Since binary_package-lists can overwrite the Packages files generated
in installer_debian-installer we have to ensure that it also updates
the Release file created formerly.
Ideally we should find a way to avoid the duplication of this logic.
Gbp-Dch: Full
This makes it possible to build an image against a first distribution
(--distribution-chroot) and have the resulting image point to another
distribution (--distribution-binary). We can use this to build against a
snapshot and have the result use the original distribution that was
snapshotted.
Closes: #888507
Future live-build versions will still allow to use casper,
but its configuration will be done differently by a custom
config tree, rather than embedded and maintenance intensive
code in live-build itself.
Otherwise users opting for XFS and JFS filesystems and installing without
network won't have them and the (first) boot can be interrupted due to
this.
Sponsored-by: Offensive Security